The ontological validity of Pandeistic views aside, I can’t help but find it intellectually intriguing that, under the parallels above, every side of the heated and long-lasting argument around the "hard problem of consciousness" seems to be simultaneously correct.
Wikipedia foundation.
Pandeism — This article is about a synthesis of deism and pantheism. For other uses, see Pandeism (disambiguation). Part of a series on God … Wikipedia
Deism — For other uses, see Deism (disambiguation). Part of a series on God General c … Wikipedia
Johannes Scotus Eriugena — (c. 815 ndash;877) (also Johannes Scotus Erigena, Johannes Scottus Eriugena, John the Irishman), was an Irish theologian, Neoplatonist philosopher, and poet. He is known for having translated and made commentaries upon the work of Pseudo… … Wikipedia
Thou Art God — is a statement of divine immanence that is popular within Neopaganism and other religions. The phrase is also stated numerous times in the pages of Robert A. Heinlein’s science fiction novel, Stranger in a Strange Land and in the Yello song… … Wikipedia
De divisione naturae — ( The division of nature , also titled Periphyseon) was the magnum opus of ninth century theologian Johannes Scotus Eriugena.[1] The work is arranged in five books. The form of exposition is that of dialogue; the method of reasoning is the… … Wikipedia
pandeistically — adverb /pænˈdeɪˈĭs tĭk.liː/ in a pandeistic manner … Wiktionary
Deism (disambiguation) — Deism is the theosophical doctrine in which it is understood that God can be found only through the exercise of reason, and does not intervene in the Universe. Deism may also refer to: Ceremonial deism, a doctrine created by the Supreme Court of… … Wikipedia
